뉴욕타임스
뉴욕타임스 인증된 계정 · 독보적인 저널리즘
2022/06/28
By Ed Yong
출처: 샐리 뎅(Sally Deng), 뉴욕타임스
Spectacle floods into my eyes whenever I watch a wildlife documentary. A vortex of small fish is gradually picked off by waves of oceanic predators. Snakes chase after marine iguanas. Giraffes clash at sunset.

While the nature shows I grew up with were more like didactic lectures, their modern counterparts — all of which seem to have the word “Planet” in the title — have the bombast of summer blockbusters. Technological advances are partly responsible. Wild creatures are difficult to film, and when footage is fleeting and scarce, narration must provide the intrigue and flair that the visuals lack. But new generations of sophisticated cameras can swoop alongside running cheetahs at ground level, zoom in on bears cavorting on inaccessible mountainsides and capture intimate close-ups of everything from wasps to whales. Shots can now linger. Nature documentaries can be cinematic.

But in the process, they have also shoved the square peg of animal life into the round hole of human narratives. When animals become easier to film, it is no longer enough to simply film them; they must have stories. They must struggle and overcome. They must have quests, conflicts, even character arcs. An elephant family searches for water amid a drought. A lonely sloth swims in search of a mate. A cheeky penguin steals rocks from a rival’s nest.
뉴욕타임스
한글로 읽는 뉴욕타임스
지금 바로 만나보세요.
이미 회원이신가요? 로그인
매주 5회, 뉴욕타임스의 보도 기사와 칼럼을 번역해 소개합니다. * 이 계정은 alookso에서 운영합니다.
599
팔로워 2.2K
팔로잉 0